ArticleIEEE sensors journal
Real-Time
Article in IEEE sensors journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between blink-related anterior segment dynamics and intraocular pressure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plasmonic smart contact lens based on etalon nanostructure for tear glucose sensing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Implantable Passive Sensors for Biomedical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Hydrogel for light delivery in biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and machine learning for Porphyromonas gingivalis detection in oral bacteria.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024Article
- Real-time in vivo monitoring of intraocular pressure distribution in the anterior chamber and vitreous chamber for diagnosis of glaucoma.Science advances · 2024Article
- Miniaturization in Glaucoma Monitoring and Treatment: A Review of New Technologies That Require a Minimal Surgical Approach.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2019Review
- Effect of optical aberrations on intraocular pressure measurements using a microscale optical implant in ex vivo rabbit eyes.Journal of biomedical optics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimized glaucoma therapy requires frequent monitoring and timely lowering of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). A recently developed microscale IOP-monitoring implant, when illuminated with broadband light, reflects a pressure-dependent optical spectrum that is captured and converted to measure IOP. However, its accuracy is limited by background noise and the difficulty of modeling non-linear shifts of the spectra with respect to pressure changes. Using an end-to-end calibration system to train an artificial neural network (ANN) for signal demodulation we improved the speed and accuracy of pressure measurements obtained with an optically probed IOP-monitoring implant and make it suitable for real-time in vivo IOP monitoring. The ANN converts captured optical spectra into corresponding IOP levels. We achieved an IOP-measurement accuracy of ±0.1 mmHg at a measurement rate of 100 Hz, which represents a ten-fold improvement from previously reported values. This technique allowed real-time tracking of artificially induced sub-1 s transient IOP elevations and minor fluctuations induced by the respiratory motion of the rabbits during in vivo monitoring. All in vivo sensor readings paralleled those obtained concurrently using a commercial tonometer and showed consistency within ±2 mmHg. Real-time processing is highly useful for IOP monitoring in clinical settings and home environments and improves the overall practicality of the optical IOP-monitoring approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.