ArticleScientific reports2018
Ileal pouch of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis patients exhibit modulation of autophagy markers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ileal J-Pouch interposition as a salvage technique for failed coloanal anastomosis: a case report.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- 4-Methylesculetin alleviated aflatoxin B1-induced liver injury and ferritinophagy through AMPK- TOR-Ulk axis in grass carp (Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota modulate intestinal inflammation by endoplasmic reticulum stress-autophagy-cell death signaling axis.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Personalized Approach to Chronic Antibiotic-Refractory Pouchitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2024Article
- Inflammatory bowel disease-specific findings are common morphological changes in the ileal pouch with ulcerative colitis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Pouchitis: insight into the pathogenesis and clinical aspects.American journal of translational research · 2022Review
- Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Autophagy: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Ulcerative Colitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Pathophysiological role of Atg5 in human ulcerative colitis.Intestinal research · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total retocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgery of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) that are refractory to clinical treatment. Pouchitis is one of the most common complications after this procedure. Defects in autophagy have been reported in inflammatory bowel diseases. However, there are no studies on the IP. Therefore, we studied markers for autophagy in the IP mucosa of UC and FAP patients comparing them to controls with a normal distal ileum. Sixteen patients with IP in "J" shape, asymptomatic and with endoscopically normal IP were evaluated. The control group consisted of eight patients with normal colonoscopy. There was a significant decrease in the transcriptional levels of ATG5, MAP1LC3A and BAX in the FAP group. There was also a decrease in the protein level of Beclin-1 in the UC and FAP compared to the control group. Although the LC3II levels by immunoblot were higher in the UC group, LC3/p62 co-localization were lower in the immunofluorescence analysis in the UC and FAP compared to the control group. Corroborating these results, there was an increase of p62 by immunoblot in the UC group. These findings indicated a modulation of macroautophagy markers in the IP, which may explain the mucosa inflammation predisposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.