Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29422539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A Global Perspective on Sulfur Oxide Controls in Coal-Fired Power Plants and Cardiovascular Disease.

Cheng-Kuan Lin, Ro-Ting Lin, Pi-Cheng Chen, Pu Wang, Nathalie De Marcellis-Warin, Corwin Zigler, David C Christiani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacies of Lung Cancer: Network Meta-Analysis Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Cheng-Kuan LinDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1406, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA.
Ro-Ting LinDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
Pi-Cheng ChenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan City, 701, Taiwan.
Pu WangInstitute of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.15 Zhong Guan Cun Bei Yi Tiao Alley, Haidian District, Beijing, 100190, China.
Nathalie De Marcellis-WarinDepartment of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Corwin ZiglerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Building 2, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
David C ChristianiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1406, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA. dchris@hsph.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USChina Medical University · TWInstitutes of Science and Development · CNNational Cheng Kung University · TWPolytechnique Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfur oxides (SO

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCardiovascular DiseasesCoalFemaleHumansIncidenceInternationalityMalePower PlantsRiskSulfur OxidesAir PollutantsCoalSulfur Oxides

Identifiers

PMID29422539
PMCPMC5805744
OpenAlexW2793519753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.