Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29422521›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2019

The pulvinar nucleus and antidepressant treatment: dynamic modeling of antidepressant response and remission with ultra-high field functional MRI.

Christoph Kraus, Manfred Klöbl, Martin Tik, Bastian Auer, Thomas Vanicek, Nicole Geissberger, Daniela M Pfabigan, Andreas Hahn, Michael Woletz, Katharina Paul and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Imaging-Based Subtyping for Psychiatric Syndromes.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph KrausNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7144-2282
Manfred KlöblNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin TikCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6571-4413
Bastian AuerSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas VanicekNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicole GeissbergerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniela M PfabiganSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-1695
Andreas HahnNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael WoletzCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina PaulSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arkadiusz KomorowskiNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-4333
Siegfried KasperNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian WindischbergerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claus LammSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert LanzenbergerNeuroimaging Labs, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. rupert.lanzenberger@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-9539
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) successfully disentangled neuronal pathophysiology of major depression (MD), but only a few fMRI studies have investigated correlates and predictors of remission. Moreover, most studies have used clinical outcome parameters from two time points, which do not optimally depict differential response times. Therefore, we aimed to detect neuronal correlates of response and remission in an antidepressant treatment study with 7 T fMRI, potentially harnessing advances in detection power and spatial specificity. Moreover, we modeled outcome parameters from multiple study visits during a 12-week antidepressant fMRI study in 26 acute (aMD) patients compared to 36 stable remitted (rMD) patients and 33 healthy control subjects (HC). During an electrical painful stimulation task, significantly higher baseline activity in aMD compared to HC and rMD in the medial thalamic nuclei of the pulvinar was detected (p = 0.004, FWE-corrected), which was reduced by treatment. Moreover, clinical response followed a sigmoid function with a plateau phase in the beginning, a rapid decline and a further plateau at treatment end. By modeling the dynamic speed of response with fMRI-data, perigenual anterior cingulate activity after treatment was significantly associated with antidepressant response (p < 0.001, FWE-corrected). Temporoparietal junction (TPJ) baseline activity significantly predicted non-remission after 2 antidepressant trials (p = 0.005, FWE-corrected). The results underline the importance of the medial thalamus, attention networks in MD and antidepressant treatment. Moreover, by using a sigmoid model, this study provides a novel method to analyze the dynamic nature of response and remission for future trials.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsBrainBrain MappingDepressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMediodorsal Thalamic NucleusPainPulvinarThalamusYoung AdultAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID29422521
PMCPMC6756007
OpenAlexW2791654015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.