ArticleJournal of human hypertension2018
Do physicians measure patients' blood pressure, and are those measurements reliable?
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Need to take action for hypertension: insights from primary care blood pressure practices in Greece.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Contribution of Final-Year Medical Students to Hypertension Diagnosis in Primary Care Units.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Concept, hardware development, and clinical trials of a Galinstan based Mercury free sphygmomanometer: Merkfree.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Simplified blood pressure measurement approaches and implications for hypertension screening: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.Journal of hypertension · 2021Article
- Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among French GPs: A long and winding road.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine how and how often blood pressure (BP) measurement is performed in health institutions. The researchers observed whether or not 84 physicians performed BP measurement. Immediately after BP measurement by the physician, this was repeated by the researchers in a manner compatible with HT guidelines. The physicians' and researchers' BP measurement results were compared. Physicians measured BP in only 37% (427) of 1130 consecutive patient examinations. None of the physicians "BP measurements were fully compatible with the guidelines" BP measurement recommendations. Physicians who performed measurements determined the same SBP and DBP as the researchers in 34.3% of patients. Hypertension was determined in 18.9% of patients in clinics in which BP measurement was not performed by physicians. Not all physicians in our study measured BP, and the great majority of those who did failed to measure it reliably. We think that it is therefore vitally important for physicians across the world to receive regular, repeated, and effective training in the importance of BP measurement and how to perform it correctly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29422514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.