ArticleParasites & vectors2018
Integrated vector control of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes around target houses.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of Aedes aegypti control trials suggests publication bias related to author disclosure of conflicts of interest.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of published literature on mosquito control action thresholds across the world.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Current evidences of the efficacy of mosquito mass-trapping interventions to reduce Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations and Aedes-borne virus transmission.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Field evaluation of the efficacy of ovillanta ovitrap towardsParasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- Strategies for controllingCaribbean journal of science · 2026Article
- Assessment of vector control strategies based on mass Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito trapping (AGOs traps) pilot study in a US-Mexico border region of South Texas.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Entomological survey to determine the role of cisterns in the production of Aedes aegypti in the U.S. Virgin Islands.PloS one · 2025Article
- GIS-Enhanced Survey of PotentialInsects · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of mass trapping interventions using autocidal gravid ovitraps (AGO) for the control of the dengue vector, Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti, in Northern Mexico.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Public Health Strategies in the Face of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review of the Zika Outbreak in India.Cureus · 2024Review
- Acceptability of emergent Aedes aegypti vector control methods in Ponce, Puerto Rico: A qualitative assessment.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Oviposition Preferences of Aedes aegypti in Msambweni, Kwale County, Kenya.Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of autocidal gravid trapping and chemical control in altering abundance and age structure of Aedes albopictus.Pest management science · 2022Article
- Association between densities of adult and immature stages of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in space and time: implications for vector surveillance.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Field trials reveal the complexities of deploying and evaluating the impacts of yeast-baited ovitraps on Aedes mosquito densities in Trinidad, West Indies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Aedes-borne infectious disease control in Latin America and the Caribbean region: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Improving the Safety and Acceptability of Autocidal Gravid Ovitraps (AGO Traps).Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · 2021Article
- Comparing sterile male releases and other methods for integrated control of the tiger mosquito in temperate and tropical climates.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Globe-TrottingVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Double BR-OVT: a new trap model for collecting eggs and adult mosquitoes from Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes spp.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe developing fetuses of pregnant women are at high risk of developing serious birth defects following Zika virus infections. We applied an Integrated Vector Control (IVC) approach using source reduction, larviciding, and mass trapping with non-insecticidal sticky traps to protect targeted houses by reducing the density of female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.
methodsWe tested the hypothesis that Ae. aegypti density could be reduced to below three female mosquitoes/trap/week around a target house in the center of a circular area with a 150 m radius using IVC. Two non-adjacent areas within the same neighbourhood were selected and randomly designated as the treatment or control areas. Sentinel Autocidal Gravid Ovitraps (SAGO traps) were placed in each study area and were sampled weekly from May to November, during the 2016 Zika epidemic in Puerto Rico. The experimental design was longitudinal with pre-and post-IVC treatment observations between treatment and control areas, and a partial cross-over design, where IVC was applied to the original control area after 2 months to determine if Ae. aegypti density converged to levels observed in the treatment area. Pools of female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were analyzed by RT-PCR to detect Zika, dengue and chikungunya virus RNA.
resultsOverall, pre-treatment mosquito densities in the inner (0-50 m; 15.6 mosquitoes/trap/week), intermediate (50-100 m; 18.1) and outer rings (100-150 m; 15.6) were reduced after treatment to 2.8, 4.1, and 4.3 in the inner, middle, and outer rings, respectively. Density at the target house in the treatment area changed from 27.7 mosquitoes/trap/week before IVC to 2.1 after IVC (92.4% reduction), whereas after treating the original control area (cross-over) density changed from 22.4 to 3.5 (84.3% reduction). Vector reductions were sustained in both areas after IVC. Zika virus was detected in Ae. aegypti, but the low incidence of the virus precluded assessing the impact of IVC on Zika transmission during the study.
conclusionsApplying IVC to circular areas that were surrounded by untreated areas significantly decreased the number of mosquitoes around target houses located in the center. Gravid Ae. aegypti females in the center of the 150 m areas fell below threshold levels that possibly protect against novel invading arboviruses, such as chikungunya and Zika.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.