ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018
Cardiac output monitoring: throw it out… or keep it?
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated echocardiography for measuring and tracking cardiac output after cardiac surgery: a validation study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Trial
- Assessing hemodynamic changes in diabetic patients with and without peripheral arterial disease using dynamic vascular optical spectroscopy.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Hemodynamic Monitoring in Sepsis-A Conceptual Framework of Macro- and Microcirculatory Alterations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- How to detect a positive response to a fluid bolus when cardiac output is not measured?Annals of intensive care · 2019Article
- Carotid and femoral Doppler do not allow the assessment of passive leg raising effects.Annals of intensive care · 2018Article
- Cardiac output and CVP monitoring… to guide fluid removal.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.