ArticleBMC health services research2018
Evaluating organizational change in health care: the patient-centered hospital model.
Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dementia-Friendly Hospital-The Perspective of Professional Dementia Experts.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- An evaluation of outpatient satisfaction in Chinese tertiary hospitals from a patient-centered perspective: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Unlocking potential: a qualitative exploration guiding the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models in healthcare.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Hospitals via Patient- and Process-Oriented Units: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction of Patients with Blood Cancer in Kazakhstan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Towards Process-Oriented Hospital Structures; Drivers behind the Development of Hospital Designs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review.Human resources for health · 2022Article
- Evaluating Patients' Experiences with Healthcare Services: Extracting Domain and Language-Specific Information from Free-Text Narratives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient-Nurse Partnerships to Prevent Medication Errors: A Concept Development Using the Hybrid Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Person-Centered Gerontological Nursing: An Overview Across Care Settings.Journal of gerontological nursing · 2021Review
- High volumes of recent surgical admissions, time to surgery, and 60-day mortality.The bone & joint journal · 2021Observational
- Countries' experiences in reforming hospital administration structure based on the Parker and Harding model: A systematic review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Review
- Article
- Inpatients' Perception of Patient-Centered Care in Guangdong Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing number of hospitals react to recent demographic, epidemiological and managerial challenges moving from a traditional organizational model to a Patient-Centered (PC) hospital model. Although the theoretical managerial literature on the PC hospital model is vast, quantitative evaluations of the performance of hospitals that moved from the traditional to the PC organizational structure is scarce. However, quantitative analysis of effects of managerial changes is important and can provide additional argument in support of innovation.
methodsWe take advantage of a quasi-experimental setting and of a unique administrative data set on the population of hospital discharge charts (HDCs) over a period of 9 years of Lombardy, the richest and one of the most populated region of Italy. During this period three important hospitals switched to the PC model in 2010, whereas all the others remained with the functional organizational model. This allowed us to develop a difference-in-difference analysis of some selected measures of efficiency and effectiveness for PC hospitals focusing on the "between-variability" of the 25 major diagnostic categories (MDCs) in each hospital and estimating a difference-in-difference model.
resultsWe contribute to the literature that addresses the evaluation of healthcare and hospital change by providing a quantitative estimation of efficiency and effectiveness changes following to the implementation of the PC hospital model. Results show that both efficiency and effectiveness have significantly increased in the average MDC of PC hospitals, thus confirming the need for policy makers to invest in new organizational models close to the principles of PC hospital structures.
conclusionsAlthough an organizational change towards the PC model can be a costly process, implying a rebalancing of responsibilities and power among hospital personnel (e.g. medical and nursing staff), our results suggest that changing towards a PC model can be worthwhile in terms of both efficacy and efficiency. This evidence can be used to inform and sustain hospital managers and policy makers in their hospital design efforts and to communicate the innovation advantages within the hospital organizations, among the personnel and in the public debate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.