Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29422030›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Prioritizing disease genes with an improved dual label propagation framework.

Yaogong Zhang, Jiahui Liu, Xiaohu Liu, Xin Fan, Yuxiang Hong, Yuan Wang, YaLou Huang, MaoQiang Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yaogong ZhangCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
Jiahui LiuCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
Xiaohu LiuCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
Xin FanCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
Yuxiang HongCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
Yuan WangSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, TianJin, 300222, China.
YaLou HuangCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China.
MaoQiang XieCollege of Software, Nankai University, TianJin, 300350, China. xiemq@nankai.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) No. 61702367The Research Project of Tianjin Municipal Commission of Education 2017KJ033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrioritizing disease genes is trying to identify potential disease causing genes for a given phenotype, which can be applied to reveal the inherited basis of human diseases and facilitate drug development. Our motivation is inspired by label propagation algorithm and the false positive protein-protein interactions that exist in the dataset. To the best of our knowledge, the false positive protein-protein interactions have not been considered before in disease gene prioritization. Label propagation has been successfully applied to prioritize disease causing genes in previous network-based methods. These network-based methods use basic label propagation, i.e. random walk, on networks to prioritize disease genes in different ways. However, all these methods can not deal with the situation in which plenty false positive protein-protein interactions exist in the dataset, because the PPI network is used as a fixed input in previous methods. This important characteristic of data source may cause a large deviation in results.

resultsA novel network-based framework IDLP is proposed to prioritize candidate disease genes. IDLP effectively propagates labels throughout the PPI network and the phenotype similarity network. It avoids the method falling when few disease genes are known. Meanwhile, IDLP models the bias caused by false positive protein interactions and other potential factors by treating the PPI network matrix and the phenotype similarity matrix as the matrices to be learnt. By amending the noises in training matrices, it improves the performance results significantly. We conduct extensive experiments over OMIM datasets, and IDLP has demonstrated its effectiveness compared with eight state-of-the-art approaches. The robustness of IDLP is also validated by doing experiments with disturbed PPI network. Furthermore, We search the literatures to verify the predicted new genes got by IDLP are associated with the given diseases, the high prediction accuracy shows IDLP can be a powerful tool to help biologists discover new disease genes.

conclusionsIDLP model is an effective method for disease gene prioritization, particularly for querying phenotypes without known associated genes, which would be greatly helpful for identifying disease genes for less studied phenotypes. AVAILABILITY: https://github.com/nkiip/IDLP.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveComputational BiologyDiseaseHumansParkinson DiseasePhenotypeProtein Interaction MapsStatistics as TopicGene prioritizationHeterogeneous networkLabel propagation

Identifiers

PMID29422030
PMCPMC5806269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.