Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29421588›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2018

Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems.

Clarissa M Liu, Scott E Kanoski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of a soybean oil-enriched diet on metabolic parameters in a chick model of childhood obesity.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clarissa M LiuUniversity of Southern California, Neuroscience Graduate Program, Los Angeles, CA, United States; University of Southern California, Department of Biological Sciences, Human and Evolutionary Biology Section, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Scott E KanoskiUniversity of Southern California, Neuroscience Graduate Program, Los Angeles, CA, United States; University of Southern California, Department of Biological Sciences, Human and Evolutionary Biology Section, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: kanoski@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Higher-Order Neural Control of Food IntakeR01DK104897 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANOSKI, SCOTT EDWARD · 2015 to 2024
$4.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainFeeding BehaviorHomeostasisHumansDopamineEnergy balanceFood intakeFood rewardHippocampusHypothalamusObesity

Identifiers

PMID29421588
PMCPMC6077115
OpenAlexW2788101464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.