Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29420741›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018

Use of text-mining methods to improve efficiency in the calculation of drug exposure to support pharmacoepidemiology studies.

Stuart McTaggart, Clifford Nangle, Jacqueline Caldwell, Samantha Alvarez-Madrazo, Helen Colhoun, Marion Bennie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Drug Abuse Research Trend Investigation with Text Mining.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stuart McTaggartPublic Health and Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Clifford NanglePublic Health and Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Jacqueline CaldwellPublic Health and Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Samantha Alvarez-MadrazoStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Helen ColhounInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marion BenniePublic Health and Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Arthritis Research UKBritish Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeMedical Research Council MC_PC_13040Medical Research Council MR/K007017/1Medical Research Council MR/M501633/1Medical Research Council MR/M501633/2Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust MR/K007017/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efficient generation of structured dose instructions that enable researchers to calculate drug exposure is central to pharmacoepidemiology studies. Our aim was to design and test an algorithm to codify dose instructions, applied to the NHS Scotland Prescribing Information System (PIS) that records about 100 million prescriptions per annum. Methods: A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was developed that enabled free-text dose instructions to be represented by three attributes - quantity, frequency and qualifier - specified by three, three and two variables, respectively. A sample of 15 593 distinct dose instructions was used to test, validate and refine the algorithm. The final algorithm used a zero-assumption approach and was then applied to the full dataset. Results: The initial algorithm generated structured output for 13 152 (84.34%) of the 15 593 sample dose instructions, and reviewers identified 767 (5.83%) incorrect translations, giving an accuracy of 94.17%. Following subsequent refinement of the algorithm rules, application to the full dataset of 458 227 687 prescriptions (99.67% had dose instructions represented by 4 964 083 distinct instructions) generated a structured output for 92.3% of dose instruction texts. This varied by therapeutic area (from 86.7% for the central nervous system to 96.8% for the cardiovascular system). Conclusions: We created an NLP algorithm, operational at scale, to produce structured output that gives data users maximum flexibility to formulate, test and apply their own assumptions according to the medicines under investigation. Text mining approaches can provide a solution to the safe and efficient management and provisioning of large volumes of data generated through our health systems.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPharmacoepidemiologyData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHumansNational Health ProgramsPrescriptionsScotland

Identifiers

PMID29420741
PMCPMC5913611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.