Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29420719›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Microbial Dark Matter Investigations: How Microbial Studies Transform Biological Knowledge and Empirically Sketch a Logic of Scientific Discovery.

Guillaume Bernard, Jananan S Pathmanathan, Romain Lannes, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Case for Limiting "Sequences of Concern" to Those with Demonstrated Pathogenic Function.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frequent nonhomologous replacement of replicative helicase loaders by viruses inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guillaume BernardSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), France.
Jananan S PathmanathanSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), France.
Romain LannesSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), France.
Philippe LopezSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), France.
Eric BaptesteSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes are the oldest and most widespread, phylogenetically and metabolically diverse life forms on Earth. However, they have been discovered only 334 years ago, and their diversity started to become seriously investigated even later. For these reasons, microbial studies that unveil novel microbial lineages and processes affecting or involving microbes deeply (and repeatedly) transform knowledge in biology. Considering the quantitative prevalence of taxonomically and functionally unassigned sequences in environmental genomics data sets, and that of uncultured microbes on the planet, we propose that unraveling the microbial dark matter should be identified as a central priority for biologists. Based on former empirical findings of microbial studies, we sketch a logic of discovery with the potential to further highlight the microbial unknowns.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMetagenomicsBacteriaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID29420719
PMCPMC5830969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.