Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29420713›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2018

Symptoms in primary care with time to diagnosis of brain tumours.

Mio Ozawa, Paul M Brennan, Karolis Zienius, Kathreena M Kurian, William Hollingworth, David Weller, Willie Hamilton, Robin Grant, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mio OzawaPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Paul M BrennanTranslational Neurosurgery Unit, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Karolis ZieniusCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kathreena M KurianInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
William HollingworthPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David WellerCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Willie HamiltonPrimary Care Diagnostics, University of Exeter Medical School, College House, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Robin GrantCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain tumours often present with varied, non-specific features with other diagnoses usually being more likely. Objective: To examine how different symptoms and patient demographics predict variations in time to brain tumour diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of brain tumour cases from National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care. We grouped neurological symptoms into six domains (headache, behavioural/cognitive change, focal neurology, 'fits, faints or falls', non-specific neurological, and other/non-specific) and calculated times for patient presentation, GP referral, specialist consultation and total pathway interval. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for symptom domains comparing the slowest to other quartiles. Results: Data were available for 226 cases. Median (interquartile range) time for the total pathway interval was 24 days (7-65 days). The most common presentation was focal neurology (33.2%) followed by 'fits, faints or falls' and headache (both 20.8%). Headache only (OR = 4.11, 95% CI = 1.10, 15.5) and memory complaints (OR = 4.82, 95% CI = 1.15, 20.1) were associated with slower total pathway compared to 'fits, faints or falls'. GPs were more likely to consider that there had been avoidable delays in referring patients with headache only (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.14, 15.3). Conclusion: Patients presenting to primary care with headache only or with memory complaints remain problematic with potentially avoidable delays in referral leading to a longer patient pathway. This may or may not impact on the efficacy and morbidity of therapies. Additional aids are required to help doctors differentiate when to refer headaches and memory complaints urgently for a specialist opinion.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareReferral and ConsultationTime-to-TreatmentAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID29420713
PMCPMC6142711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.