ArticleBMJ open2018
'Care Under Pressure': a realist review of interventions to tackle doctors' mental ill-health and its impacts on the clinical workforce and patient care.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of emotional support on healthcare workers and students coping with COVID-19, and other SARS-CoV pandemics - a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Healthcare Professionals' Own Experiences of Domestic Violence and Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Systematic Review of Risk Markers and Consequences.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2023Pooled it
- Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Mental health of clinical staff working in high-risk epidemic and pandemic health emergencies a rapid review of the evidence and living meta-analysis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review.Medical education · 2020Pooled it
- Stress in first-year medical students: a multidimensional analysis of emotional Intelligence, empathy, and cardiovascular health.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Understanding the Needs of Moderators in Online Mental Health Forums: Realist Synthesis and Recommendations for Support.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Analysis of factors affecting the engagement of pharmacists with the organization working in public health facilities: a quantitative study in Vietnam.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Relationship between religious coping and post-traumatic stress disorder and professional quality of life of nurses working at COVID-19 wards: a descriptive correlational study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- UK general practice service delivery research priorities: an adapted James Lind Alliance approach.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Perceptions of healthcare professionals' psychological wellbeing at work and the link to patients' experiences of care: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Article
- Implementing complex interventions to mitigate burnout among qualified healthcare professionals: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Healthcare providers as patients: COVID-19 experience.PloS one · 2023Article
- Health and social care workers experiences of coping while working in the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic: One year on.PloS one · 2023Article
- Clinical Teaching Fellows, the new norm?-Experiences of fellows and education faculty.The clinical teacher · 2022Article
- Silver linings: will the COVID-19 pandemic instigate long overdue mental health support services for healthcare workers?British journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Realist Review of Care Models That Include Primary Care for Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2022Review
- Experiences and views of frontline healthcare workers' family members in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMental ill-health is prevalent across all groups of health professionals and this is of great concern in many countries. In the UK, the mental health of the National Health Service (NHS) workforce is a major healthcare issue, leading to presenteeism, absenteeism and loss of staff from the workforce. Most interventions targeting doctors aim to increase their 'productivity' and 'resilience', placing responsibility for good mental health with doctors themselves and neglecting the organisational and structural contexts that may have a detrimental effect on doctors' well-being. There is a need for approaches that are sensitive to the contextual complexities of mental ill-health in doctors, and that do not treat doctors as a uniform body, but allow distinctions to account for particular characteristics, such as specialty, career stage and different working environments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our project aims to understand how, why and in what contexts support interventions can be designed to minimise the incidence of doctors' mental ill-health. We will conduct a realist review-a form of theory-driven interpretative systematic review-of interventions, drawing on diverse literature sources. The review will iteratively progress through five steps: (1) locate existing theories; (2) search for evidence; (3) select articles; (4) extract and organise data and (5) synthesise evidence and draw conclusions. The analysis will summarise how, why and in what circumstances doctors' mental ill-health is likely to develop and what can remediate the situation. Throughout the project, we will also engage iteratively with diverse stakeholders in order to produce actionable theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for our review. Our dissemination strategy will be participatory. Tailored outputs will be targeted to: policy makers; NHS employers and healthcare leaders; team leaders; support organisations; doctors experiencing mental ill-health, their families and colleagues. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017069870.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.