Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29419763›Full record

ReviewViruses2018

The Regulation of Translation in Alphavirus-Infected Cells.

Luis Carrasco, Miguel Angel Sanz, Esther González-Almela

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis CarrascoCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1., Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. lcarrasco@cbm.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-8835
Miguel Angel SanzCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1., Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. masanz@cbm.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-883X
Esther González-AlmelaCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1., Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. emgonzalez@cbm.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0002-2071-8365
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sindbis virus (SINV) contains an RNA genome of positive polarity with two open reading frames (ORFs). The first ORF is translated from the genomic RNA (gRNA), rendering the viral non-structural proteins, whereas the second ORF is translated from a subgenomic mRNA (sgRNA), which directs the synthesis of viral structural proteins. SINV infection strongly inhibits host cell translation through a variety of different mechanisms, including the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF2α and the redistribution of cellular proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. A number of motifs have been identified in SINV sgRNA, including a hairpin downstream of the AUG initiation codon, which is involved in the translatability of the viral sgRNA when eIF2 is inactivated. Moreover, a 3'-UTR motif containing three stem-loop structures is involved in the enhancement of translation in insect cells, but not in mammalian cells. Accordingly, SINV sgRNA has evolved several structures to efficiently compete for the cellular translational machinery. Mechanistically, sgRNA translation involves scanning of the 5'-UTR following a non-canonical mode and without the requirement for several initiation factors. Indeed, sgRNA-directed polypeptide synthesis occurs even after eIF4G cleavage or inactivation of eIF4A by selective inhibitors. Remarkably, eIF2α phosphorylation does not hamper sgRNA translation during the late phase of SINV infection. SINV sgRNA thus constitutes a unique model of a capped viral mRNA that is efficiently translated in the absence of several canonical initiation factors. The present review will mainly focus in the non-canonical mechanism of translation of SINV sgRNA.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsProtein Biosynthesis3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsAlphavirusAlphavirus InfectionsAnimalsGenome, ViralHumansRNA, ViralSindbis Virus3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsRNA, Viralalphavirusesinitiation factorsIRESregulation of translationRNA structure

Identifiers

PMID29419763
PMCPMC5850377
OpenAlexW2790311195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.