Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29419698›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Next-generation sequencing diagnostics of bacteremia in sepsis (Next GeneSiS-Trial): Study protocol of a prospective, observational, noninterventional, multicenter, clinical trial.

Thorsten Brenner, Sebastian O Decker, Silke Grumaz, Philip Stevens, Thomas Bruckner, Thomas Schmoch, Mathias W Pletz, Hendrik Bracht, Stefan Hofer, Gernot Marx and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03356249 (Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostics of Bacteremia in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03356249 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostics of Bacteremia in Sepsis (Next GeneSiS-Trial) - Study Protocol for a Prospective, Observational, Non-interventional, Multicenter, Clinical Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2019 to 2021Enrolled500ConditionsSepsis, Septic ShockArmsNext-Generation Sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. RAPIDViruses · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria From Septic Patients Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene-Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Fraunhofer IGB, Stuttgart Noscendo GmbH, Duisburg Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Intensive Care, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm Department of Anesthesiology, Westpfalzklinikum, Kaiserslautern Department of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian O Decker
Silke Grumaz
Philip Stevens
Thomas Bruckner
Thomas Schmoch
Mathias W Pletz
Hendrik Bracht
Stefan Hofer
Gernot Marx
Markus A Weigand
Kai Sohn
TIFOnet Critical Care Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains a major challenge, even in modern intensive care medicine. The identification of the causative pathogen is crucial for an early optimization of the antimicrobial treatment regime. In this context, culture-based diagnostic procedures (e.g., blood cultures) represent the standard of care, although they are associated with relevant limitations. Accordingly, culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures might be of help for the identification of the causative pathogen in infected patients. The concept of an unbiased sequence analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma samples of septic patients by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been identified to be a promising diagnostic platform for critically ill patients suffering from bloodstream infections. Although this new approach might be more sensitive and specific than culture-based state-of-the-art technologies, additional clinical trials are needed to exactly define the performance as well as clinical value of a NGS-based approach.

methodsNext GeneSiS is a prospective, observational, noninterventional, multicenter study to assess the diagnostic performance of a NGS-based approach for the detection of relevant infecting organisms in patients with suspected or proven sepsis [according to recent sepsis definitions (sepsis-3)] by the use of the quantitative sepsis indicating quantifier (SIQ) score in comparison to standard (culture-based) microbiological diagnostics. The clinical value of this NGS-based approach will be estimated by a panel of independent clinical specialists, retrospectively identifying potential changes in patients' management based on NGS results. Further subgroup analyses will focus on the clinical value especially for patients suffering from a failure of empiric treatment within the first 3 days after onset [as assessed by death of the patient or lack of improvement of the patient's clinical condition (in terms of an inadequate decrease of SOFA-score) or persistent high procalcitonin levels]. DISCUSSION: This prospective, observational, noninterventional, multicenter study for the first time investigates the performance as well as the clinical value of a NGS-based approach for the detection of bacteremia in patients with sepsis and may therefore be a pivotal step toward the clinical use of NGS in this indication.

trial registrationDRKS-ID: DRKS00011911 (registered October 9, 2017) https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011911; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03356249 (registered November 29, 2017) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03356249.

Indexed as

BacteriaSepsisAdultDNA, BacterialFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleProspective StudiesResearch DesignSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29419698
PMCPMC5944698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.