ArticleHaematologica2018
Toxicities and outcomes of 616 ibrutinib-treated patients in the United States: a real-world analysis.
Article in Haematologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03816683 (Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 249 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Disease Registry of Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated With Novel Agents
Who cites it
249 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Venetoclax Plus Rituximab for Relapse/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Treatments Available in Brazil.Oncology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of first- versus second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Venetoclax alone or in combination with other regimens treatment achieve deep and sustained remission of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2022Pooled it
- IGNITE: a phase III study of tirabrutinib versus rituximab and temozolomide combination therapy in relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in patients with CLL/SLL intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: updated results.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Prospective phase II trial of first-line rituximab, methotrexate, and orelabrutinib (R-MO) in primary central nervous system lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2025Trial
- Pirtobrutinib monotherapy in Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-intolerant patients with B-cell malignancies: results of the phase I/II BRUIN trial.Haematologica · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A phase 1b study of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Leukemia · 2023Trial
- Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Phase III Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Adding Umbralisib and Ublituximab (U2) to Ibrutinib in Patients with CLL: A Phase II Study of an MRD-Driven Approach.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- First-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumabHaematologica · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Zanubrutinib for treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: long-term follow-up of the phase I/II AU-003 study.British journal of haematology · 2022Trial
- Phase II study of acalabrutinib in ibrutinib-intolerant patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Haematologica · 2021Trial
- Trial
- A multicenter, open-label, phase II study of tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059) in patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.Cancer science · 2020Trial
189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials that led to ibrutinib's approval for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia showed that its side effects differ from those of traditional chemotherapy. Reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice have not been adequately studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with ibrutinib either commercially or on clinical trials. We aimed to compare the type and frequency of toxicities reported in either setting, assess discontinuation rates, and evaluate outcomes. This multicenter, retrospective analysis included ibrutinib-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients at nine United States cancer centers or from the Connect® Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Registry. We examined demographics, dosing, discontinuation rates and reasons, toxicities, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Six hundred sixteen ibrutinib-treated patients were identified. A total of 546 (88%) patients were treated with the commercial drug. Clinical trial patients were younger (mean age 58
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.