Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29419404›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Quantitative Analysis of Conebeam CT for Delineating Stents in Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization.

T Kuriyama, N Sakai, M Beppu, C Sakai, H Imamura, K Masago, N Katakami, H Isoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T KuriyamaFrom the Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences (T.K., H. Isoda), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan t.kuriyama@nagoya-u.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-4058
N SakaiNeuroendovascular Therapy (N.S., C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-3289-1210
M BeppuDivision of Neurosurgery (N.S., M.B., H. Imamura), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3484-5733
C SakaiNeuroendovascular Therapy (N.S., C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-4957-9450
H ImamuraDivision of Neurosurgery (N.S., M.B., H. Imamura), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-7861
K MasagoDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics (K.M.), Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3569-2978
N KatakamiIntegrated Oncology (N.K.), Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-6441
H IsodaFrom the Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences (T.K., H. Isoda), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3249-7520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInnovative techniques and device-related advances have improved the outcomes of neuroendovascular treatment. 3D imaging has previously used 2 × 2 binning, but 1 × 1 binning has recently been made available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantitative ability of conebeam CT for stent delineation and to investigate its effectiveness in the clinical environment. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour acquisition groups of 3D MIP images acquired using conebeam CT with varying conditions (acquisition time, 10 or 20 seconds and binning, 1 × 1 or 2 × 2) were compared. Two methods of analysis were performed, a phantom study and an analysis of 28 randomly selected patients. The phantom study assessed the contrast-to-noise ratio and full width at half maximum values in conebeam CT images of intracranial stent struts. In the clinical subjects, we assessed contrast-to-noise ratio, full width at half maximum, and dose-area product.

resultsIn the phantom study, the contrast-to-noise ratio was not considerably different between 10- and 20-second acquisition times at equivalent binning settings. Additionally, the contrast-to-noise ratio at equivalent acquisition times did not differ considerably by binning setting. For the full width at half maximum results, equivalent acquisition times differed significantly by binning setting. In the clinical analyses, the 10-second/1 × 1 group (versus 20 second/2 × 2) showed a higher contrast-to-noise ratio (

conclusionsFor stent-assisted coil embolization, quantitative assessment of conebeam CT showed that 10 second/1 × 1 was equivalent to 20 second/2 × 2 for imaging deployed intracranial stents. Furthermore, the 10-second/1 × 1 settings resulted in a much smaller DAP.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisStentsEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMalePhantoms, ImagingSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29419404
PMCPMC7655337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.