Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417865›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018

Advanced diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with optic neuritis deficit - value of reduced field of view DWI and readout-segmented DWI.

Achim Seeger, Maximilian Schulze, Frank Schuettauf, Ulrike Ernemann, Till-Karsten Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Tractometry of Human Visual White Matter Pathways in Health and Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Parallel Transmission for Ultrahigh Field MRI.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Achim Seeger1 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4585-649X
Maximilian Schulze1 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany.
Frank Schuettauf3 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Ulrike Ernemann1 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany.
Till-Karsten Hauser1 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate advanced techniques of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the optic nerve in patients with optic neuritis. Methods In this prospective and institutional review board-approved trial, we examined 15 patients with acute visual loss and clinical signs of optic neuritis including thin-slice multi-shot segmented readout of long variable echo trains (rs-EPI, RESOLVE) DWI and reduced field-of view DWI using a parallel transmit system (rFOV-EPI). Conventional single-shot echo-planar DWI (ss-EPI) of the whole brain was available in 13 patients. Subjective image quality was compared using a four-point scale and objective ADC measurements were performed in comparison with the non-affected side. Results In the intraorbital segment, subjective image quality was significantly higher in rFOV-EPI (score 3.3 ± 0.8) compared with rs-EPI (score 2.1 ± 0.8) and ss-EPI (score 0.9 ± 0.8). Diagnosis was hampered in the canalicular segment ( n = 3) and the intracranial segment ( n = 1) in all applied DWI techniques. ADC measurements of the affected side differed significantly in all DWI sequences ss-EPI (sensitivity 54%, accuracy 77%), rs-EPI (sensitivity 71%, accuracy 86%), and rFOV-EPI (sensitivity 73%, accuracy 87%). Conclusion Optic neuritis in the intraorbital segment can be detected with high sensitivity without the need for contrast application. Using rFOV-EPI improves subjective image quality compared with rs-EPI and ss-EPI. Due to its higher spatial resolution, rFOV-EPI was the preferred technique in our study and can ensure the diagnosis in the intraorbital segment. However, artefacts occur in the canalicular and intracranial segment of the optic nerve, therefore contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images must still be considered as the gold standard.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedOptic NeuritisProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDWIoptic neuritisparallel transmitpTXRESOLVEzoomed EPI

Identifiers

PMID29417865
PMCPMC5882068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.