Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417760›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2018

Fosfomycin as a potential therapy for the treatment of systemic infections: a population pharmacokinetic model to simulate multiple dosing regimens.

Natalia V Ortiz Zacarías, Anneke C Dijkmans, Jacobus Burggraaf, Johan W Mouton, Erik B Wilms, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Daan J Touw, Ingrid M C Kamerling, Jasper Stevens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Population pharmacokinetics of oral fosfomycin calcium in healthy women.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024
    Trial
  2. Structural Studies ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia V Ortiz ZacaríasCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Anneke C DijkmansCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobus BurggraafCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johan W MoutonDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Erik B WilmsHospital Pharmacy The Hague Hospitals, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Hague Hospitals, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Daan J TouwUniversity Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ingrid M C KamerlingCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jasper StevensCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-9008
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLApotheek Haagse Ziekenhuizen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fosfomycin has emerged as a potential therapy for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In most European countries, the oral formulation is only approved as a 3 g single dose for treatment of uncomplicated cystitis. However, for the treatment of complicated systemic infections, this dose regimen is unlikely to reach efficacious serum and tissue concentrations. This study aims to investigate different fosfomycin-dosing regimens to evaluate its rationale for treatment of systemic infections. Serum concentration-time profiles of fosfomycin were simulated using a population pharmacokinetic model based on published pharmacokinetic parameter values, their uncertainty, inter-individual variability and covariates. The model was validated on published data and used to simulate a wide range of dosing regimens for oral and intravenous administration of fosfomycin. Finally, based on the minimum inhibitory concentration for E. coli, surrogate pharmacodynamic indices were calculated for each dosing regimen. This is the first population pharmacokinetic model to describe the oral pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin using data from different literature sources. The model and surrogate pharmacodynamic indices provide quantitative evidence that a dosing regimen of 6-12 g per day divided in 3 doses is required to obtain efficacious exposure and may serve as a first step in the treatment of systemic multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdministration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliFeasibility StudiesFosfomycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSepsisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinfosfomycinfosfomycin tromethaminemulti-drug resistantpopulation pharmacokineticssimulationsystemic infections

Identifiers

PMID29417760
PMCPMC5803932
OpenAlexW2785603054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.