Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417467›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2018

Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Hemodynamic Assessment and Treatment Selection-Focus on Group II Pulmonary Hypertension.

Bhavadharini Ramu, Brian A Houston, Ryan J Tedford

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhavadharini RamuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Strom Thurmond Gazes Building, Room 215, 114 Doughty St/MSC592, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Brian A HoustonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Strom Thurmond Gazes Building, Room 215, 114 Doughty St/MSC592, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Ryan J TedfordDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Strom Thurmond Gazes Building, Room 215, 114 Doughty St/MSC592, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. TedfordR@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension worldwide, yet therapies used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension have failed to show efficacy in this population. Proper hemodynamic assessment and differentiation of pulmonary hypertension phenotypes is therefore critical for both current clinical practice and future research and therapeutic efforts. RECENT

findingsSubstantial recent efforts have sought to improve the hemodynamic characterization of pulmonary hypertension for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. These efforts include identifying occult LHD using provocative maneuvers as well as sub-classifying PH-LHD based on the presence or absence of a pre-capillary component. How to best define the pre-capillary component remains controversial as several studies have drawn conflicting conclusions. The lack of standardization of hemodynamic measurements as well as measurement fidelity concerns may explain some of the discrepant results. Non-hemodynamic methods of PH-LHD classification may also have an emerging role. Despite recent advances, therapeutic studies have largely remained disappointing. In this review, we discuss the nuances and controversies surrounding diagnostic and prognostic hemodynamic characterization of PH-LHD as well as summarize the recent therapeutic efforts and ongoing challenges in this population.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryPatient SelectionDisease ManagementFocus GroupsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPulmonary CirculationPulmonary Wedge PressureVascular ResistanceHemodynamicsLeft heart diseasePulmonary hypertensionRight heart catheterization

Identifiers

PMID29417467
OpenAlexW2793171433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.