Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417440›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2018

Caffeine Protects Against Anticonvulsant-Induced Impaired Neurogenesis in the Developing Rat Brain.

Stefanie Endesfelder, Ulrike Weichelt, Cornelia Schiller, Katja Winter, Clarissa von Haefen, Christoph Bührer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Neonatal Seizures and Purinergic Signalling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Use of Caffeine by People with Epilepsy: the Myths and the Evidence.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie EndesfelderDepartment of Neonatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. stefanie.endesfelder@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-7969
Ulrike WeicheltEndowed Professorship of Immunotechnology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Campus Golm, Karl-Liebknechtstraße 24-25, 14476, Potsdam - Golm, Germany.
Cornelia SchillerDepartment of Neonatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Katja WinterDepartment of Neonatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Clarissa von HaefenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph BührerDepartment of Neonatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preterm infants, phenobarbital is the first-line antiepileptic drug for neonatal seizures while caffeine is used for the treatment of apnea. Data from experimental animals suggest that phenobarbital and other anticonvulsants are toxic for the developing brain, while neuroprotective effects have been reported for caffeine both in newborn rodents and preterm human infants. To characterize the interaction of phenobarbital and caffeine in the hippocampus of the developing rodent brain, we examined the effects of both drugs given separately or together on postnatal neurogenesis after administration to neonatal rats throughout postnatal day (P) 4 to P6. Phenobarbital treatment (50 mg/kg) resulted in a significant decrease of proliferative capacity in the dentate gyrus. Phenobarbital also reduced expression of neuronal markers (doublecortin (DCX), calretinin, NeuN), neuronal transcription factors (Pax6, Sox2, Tbr1/2, Prox1), and neurotrophins (NGF, BDNF, NT-3) up to 24 h after the last administration. The phenobarbital-mediated impairment of neurogenesis was largely ameliorated by preconditioning with caffeine (10 mg/kg). In contrast, caffeine alone reduced proliferative capacity and expression of the neuronal markers DCX and NeuN at 6 h, but increased expression of neurotrophins and neuronal transcription factors at 6 and 12 h. These results indicate that administration of phenobarbital during the vulnerable phase of brain development negatively interferes with neuronal development, which can be prevented in part by co-administration of caffeine.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnticonvulsantsBrainBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCaffeineCell ProliferationDNA-Binding ProteinsDoublecortin ProteinFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMaleNerve Growth FactorNerve Tissue ProteinsAnticonvulsantsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCaffeineDcx protein, ratDNA-Binding ProteinsDoublecortin ProteinHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseNerve Growth FactorNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroprotective AgentsNeurotrophin 3PAX6 Transcription FactorPhenobarbitalRNA, MessengerCaffeineDeveloping brainHippocampal neurogenesisPhenobarbitalPreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID29417440
OpenAlexW2787760548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.