Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417295›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2018

The effect of a medication reconciliation program in two intensive care units in the Netherlands: a prospective intervention study with a before and after design.

Liesbeth B E Bosma, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Rogier A M Quax, Edmé Meuwese, Piet H G J Melief, Jasper van Bommel, SiokSwan Tan, Maaike J van Kranenburg, Patricia M L A van den Bemt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Choosing Wisely Canada climate-conscious recommendations for critical care medicine.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liesbeth B E BosmaDepartment of Pharmacy, Haga Teaching Hospital, Els Borst-Eilersplein 275, 2545 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands. l.bosma@hagaziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-5617
Nicole G M HunfeldDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rogier A M QuaxDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edmé MeuweseDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Piet H G J MeliefDepartment of Intensive Care, Haga Teaching Hospital, PO Box 43100, 2504 AC, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Jasper van BommelDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
SiokSwan TanDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike J van KranenburgDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Gelre Hospitals, PO Box 9014, 7300 DS, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors occur frequently in the intensive care unit (ICU) and during care transitions. Chronic medication is often temporarily stopped at the ICU. Unfortunately, when the patient improves, the restart of this medication is easily forgotten. Moreover, temporal ICU medication is often unintentionally continued after ICU discharge. Medication reconciliation could be useful to prevent such errors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of medication reconciliation at the ICU.

methodsThis prospective 8-month study with a pre- and post-design was carried out in two ICU settings in the Netherlands. Patients were included when they used ≥ 1 chronic medicine and when the ICU stay exceeded 24 h. The intervention consisted of medication reconciliation by pharmacists at the moment of ICU admission and prior to ICU discharge. Medication transfer errors (MTEs) were collected and the severity of potential harm of these MTEs was measured, based on a potential adverse drug event score (pADE = 0; 0.01; 0.1; 0.4; 0.6). Primary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with ≥ 1 MTE at ICU admission and after discharge. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with a pADE score ≥ 0.01 due to these MTEs, the severity of the pADEs and the associated costs. Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, by using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsIn the pre-intervention phase, 266 patients were included and 212 in the post-intervention phase. The proportion of patients with ≥ 1 MTE at ICU admission was reduced from 45.1 to 14.6% (OR

conclusionsMedication reconciliation by pharmacists at ICU transfers is an effective safety intervention, leading to a significant decrease in the number of MTE and a cost-effective reduction in potential harm. Trial registration Dutch trial register: NTR4159, 5 September 2013, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Adverse drug eventCost–benefit analysisIntensive care unitMedication reconciliationPharmacist

Identifiers

PMID29417295
PMCPMC5803169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.