Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29417172›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Axial reflexes are present in older subjects and may contribute to balance responses.

James G Colebatch, Sendhil Govender

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James G ColebatchPrince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. j.colebatch@unsw.edu.au.
Sendhil GovenderNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the response to axial taps (mini-perturbations) of a group of 13 healthy older subjects (mean age 63 ± 12 years, 7 females, 6 males), 12 of whom were also studied using larger applied (macro-) perturbations requiring active postural responses. The mini-perturbation consisted of a brief impulsive force produced by a mini-shaker applied to the trunk at the level of the shoulders and anteriorly at the upper sternum which was perceived as a tap. Acceleration, force platform, and EMG measurements were made. The average peak accelerations for the mini-perturbations were 108 mG (anterior) and - 78.9 mG (posterior). Responses overall were very similar to those previously reported for younger subjects: the perturbation evoked short latency responses in leg muscles, modulated by degree and direction of lean, and were largest for the muscle most relevant for the postural correction. The increases in the amplitude for the main agonist were greater than the increase in tonic activity. With both anterior and posterior lean, co-contraction responses were present. The size of the EMG response to the mini-perturbations correlated with the corresponding earliest EMG responses (0-100, 100-200 ms intervals) to the larger postural perturbations, timing which corresponds to balance responses. The balance responses evoked by the larger imposed postural perturbations may, therefore, receive a contribution through the reflex pathway mediating the axial tap responses, whose efferent limb appears to be the reticulospinal tract.

Indexed as

AgedAgingElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalancePosturePerturbationPostural reflexesPostureStance

Identifiers

PMID29417172
OpenAlexW2786903838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.