ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017
Extending Situated Language Comprehension (Accounts) with Speaker and Comprehender Characteristics: Toward Socially Situated Interpretation.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictability effects during reading comprehension are not modulated by a visuospatial working memory load.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Eye-tracking context formality effects in German and Japanese sentence processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Causal Contributions of the Domain-General (Multiple Demand) and the Language-Selective Brain Networks to Perceptual and Semantic Challenges in Speech Comprehension.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, and cultural aspects: Evidence from complementary methods.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Situating language in a minimal social context: how seeing a picture of the speaker's face affects language comprehension.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Grounding Language Processing: The Added Value of Specifying Linguistic/Compositional Representations and Processes.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
- Integration of Social Context vs. Linguistic Reference During Situated Language Processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Effects of Dispositional Affect on the N400: Language Processing and Socially Situated Context.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Empathy influences how listeners interpret intonation and meaning when words are ambiguous.Memory & cognition · 2020Article
- Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Referential vs. Non-referential World-Language Relations: How Do They Modulate Language Comprehension in 4 to 5-Year-Olds, Younger, and Older Adults?Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More and more findings suggest a tight temporal coupling between (non-linguistic) socially interpreted context and language processing. Still, real-time language processing accounts remain largely elusive with respect to the influence of biological (e.g., age) and experiential (e.g., world and moral knowledge) comprehender characteristics and the influence of the 'socially interpreted' context, as for instance provided by the speaker. This context could include actions, facial expressions, a speaker's voice or gaze, and gestures among others. We review findings from social psychology, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics to highlight the relevance of (the interplay between) the socially interpreted context and comprehender characteristics for language processing. The review informs the extension of an extant real-time processing account (already featuring a coordinated interplay between language comprehension and the non-linguistic visual context) with a variable ('ProCom') that captures characteristics of the language user and with a first approximation of the comprehender's speaker representation. Extending the CIA to the sCIA (social Coordinated Interplay Account) is the first step toward a real-time language
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.