Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29416325›Full record

SynthesisClinical interventions in aging2018

Implementing Dementia Care Mapping as a practice development tool in dementia care services: a systematic review.

Claire A Surr, Alys W Griffiths, Rachael Kelley

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical interventions in aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Temporal Patterns of BPSD During a Multimodal Non-Pharmacological Intervention in Nursing Home and Daycare Centre Settings.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Feasibility and validity of EQ-5D-5L proxy by nurses in measuring health-related quality of life of nursing home residents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Practicality Assessment of the Improved ICT-Based Dementia Care Mapping Support System.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire A SurrCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Alys W GriffithsCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Rachael KelleyCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Dementia UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) is an observational tool set within a practice development process. Following training in the method, DCM is implemented via a cyclic process of briefing staff, conducting mapping observations, data analysis and report preparation, feedback to staff and action planning. Recent controlled studies of DCM's efficacy have found heterogeneous results, and variability in DCM implementation has been indicated as a potential contributing factor. This review aimed to examine the primary research evidence on the processes and the barriers and facilitators to implementing DCM as a practice development method within formal dementia care settings. PUBMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library-Cochrane reviews, HMIC (Ovid), Web of Science and Social Care Online were searched using the term "Dementia Care Mapping". Inclusion criterion was primary research studies in any formal dementia care settings where DCM was used as a practice development tool and which included discussion/critique of the implementation processes. Assessment of study quality was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Twelve papers were included in the review, representing nine research studies. The papers included discussion of various components of the DCM process, including mapper selection and preparation; mapping observations; data analysis, report writing and feedback; and action planning. However, robust evidence on requirements for successful implementation of these components was limited. Barriers and facilitators to mapping were also discussed. The review found some consensus that DCM is more likely to be successfully implemented if the right people are selected to be trained as mappers, with appropriate mapper preparation and ongoing support and with effective leadership for DCM within the implementing organization/unit and in organizations that already have a person-centered culture or ethos. Future development of the DCM tool should consider ways to save on time taken to conduct DCM cycles. More research to understand the ingredients for effective DCM implementation is needed.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchBehavior TherapyDementiaHumansPatient-Centered Caredementiaperson-centered carepractice developmentstaff training

Identifiers

PMID29416325
PMCPMC5790091
OpenAlexW2773529103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.