Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29416240›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Intensive Care Unit delirium: A wide gap between actual prevalence and psychiatric referral.

Sandeep Grover, Siddharth Sarkar, Lakshmi Narayana Yaddanapudi, Abhishek Ghosh, Amit Desouza, Debasish Basu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delirium Research in India: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep GroverDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Siddharth SarkarDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Lakshmi Narayana YaddanapudiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Abhishek GhoshDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amit DesouzaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Debasish BasuDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe study aimed to assess the rates of delirium in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) prospectively assessed with a delirium screening instrument and confirmed through psychiatrist evaluation. In addition, the referral rate to psychiatric consultation liaison services from the same ICU was assessed through the rates of psychiatric referral over the previous 10 years. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn the prospective part of the study, consecutive patients aged 16 years or more admitted to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital were assessed daily for delirium using confusion assessment method for the ICU, a validated instrument that can be used for both mechanically ventilated and nonventilated patient by trained heath care personnel. Retrospectively, records of patients referred to psychiatric referral team for delirium from the ICU over the last 10 years were drawn out and the referral rate was calculated.

resultsIn the prospective study, 109 patients were recruited of which 43 patients remained comatose throughout their ICU stay and could not be assessed for delirium. Of the 66 assessable patients, 45 (68.2% prevalence rate) patients developed delirium. Incidence rate of delirium was 59.6%. In contrast, the retrospective study showed that only 53 cases out of 3094 admissions in ICU over 10 years (1.71%) were referred to psychiatry consultation liaison team for management of delirium. In the prospective study, hypoactive delirium was the most common subtype of delirium.

conclusionThere is a mismatch between the incidence and prevalence of delirium in ICU patients prospectively diagnosed with structured, validated instruments and the diagnosis of delirium in cases referred to psychiatry consultation-liaison services.

Indexed as

Deliriumincidenceoutcomeprevalencesubtype

Identifiers

PMID29416240
PMCPMC5791261
OpenAlexW2786942325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.