Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29416118›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2018

Increasing ambulatory pulse pressure predicts the development of left ventricular hypertrophy during long-term follow-up.

Tero J W Pääkkö, Juha S Perkiömäki, Y Antero Kesäniemi, Antti S Ylitalo, Jarmo A Lumme, Heikki V Huikuri, Olavi H Ukkola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and left ventricular morphology.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tero J W PääkköMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. tero.paakko@ppshp.fi.
Juha S PerkiömäkiMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Y Antero KesäniemiMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Antti S YlitaloLappi Central Hospital, Rovaniemi, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jarmo A LummeMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Heikki V HuikuriMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Olavi H UkkolaMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-2608
Oulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) has been shown to have an association with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We evaluated the association between ABP characteristics and the development of LVH during long-term follow-up (20 years) in 420 middle-aged subjects from OPERA cohort. ABP measurements (ABPM) were recorded and echocardiographic examinations were performed at baseline and revisit. Anthropometrics were measured and laboratory analyses performed at visit. The questionnaire presented to all participants elicited detailed information about their habits. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated according to Troys method. Baseline LVMI was a significant independent predictor of LVMI change (p < 0.001). None of the baseline continuous ABPM predicted the change in LVMI. A greater increase in daytime and night-time systolic blood pressure (BP) (p from 0.006 to 0.048) and 24 h, daytime and night-time pulse pressure (PP) (p from 0.005 to 0.034) predicted a greater increase in LVMI. Especially the increase in night-time SBP (p = 0.006) and PP (p = 0.005) predicted a greater increase in LVMI. We also considered circadian BP profiles among subjects, whose ABPM at baseline and echocardiographic measurements both at baseline and follow-up were available. Diastolic non-dippers were observed to show a greater increase in LVMI compared to diastolic dippers (10.6 ± 33.0 g/m

Indexed as

Blood PressureAgedBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMale

Identifiers

PMID29416118
OpenAlexW2884663379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.