ArticleScientific reports2018
Measurement of nuclear reaction cross sections by using Cherenkov radiation toward high-precision proton therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illumination of Targeting Nanotherapeutics with Precision Eyes: From Optical to Radio-nanotheranostics.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Instantaneous in vivo distal edge verification in intensity-modulated proton therapy by means of PET imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A simulation study of in-beam visualization system for proton therapy by monitoring scattered protons.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Isotopic production cross sections in proton-16O and proton-12C interactions for energies from 10 MeV/u to 100 GeV/u.Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms · 2023Article
- Discovery of the luminescence of water during irradiation of radiation at a lower energy than the Cherenkov light threshold.Radiological physics and technology · 2021Review
- Neutron activation of gadolinium for ion therapy: a Monte Carlo study of charged particle beams.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Estimation of the fractions of luminescence of water at higher energy than Cerenkov-light threshold for various types of radiation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Precision imaging of 4.4 MeV gamma rays using a 3-D position sensitive Compton camera.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Radiation Dose Units: How We Got Here, Do They Serve the Purposes They are Intended to?Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring the in vivo dose distribution in proton therapy is desirable for the accurate irradiation of a tumor. Although positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used for confirmation, the obtained distribution of positron emitters produced by the protons does not trace the dose distribution due to the different physical processes. To estimate the accurate dose from the PET image, the cross sections of nuclear reactions that produce positron emitters are important yet far from being sufficient. In this study, we measured the cross sections of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.