Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415876›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Maesoon Im, Paul Werginz, Shelley I Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple consecutive-biphasic pulse stimulation improves spatially localized firing of retinal ganglion cells in the degenerate retina.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  9. Selective Activation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes Through Targeted Electrical Stimulation Parameters.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial Visual Information Produced by Retinal Prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Ultrasound stimulation for non-invasive visual prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Spiking Characteristics of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Direction-Selective Ganglion Cells of Rabbit and Mouse Retinas to Electric Stimulation for Retinal Prostheses.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Automatic Identification of Axon Bundle Activation for Epiretinal Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maesoon ImDepartment of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Place, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield Street, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wayne State University College of Engineering, 5050 Anthony Wayne Drive, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America.
Paul Werginz
Shelley I Fried

Funding

Micro-coil implants for cortical activationU01NS099700 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2016 to 2018
$2.9M
HRS targeting of ON and OFF ganglion cellsR01EY023651 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
Towards improved efficacy of retinal prostheticsI01RX001663 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2015 to 2017
–
Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3947NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023651NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099700RRD VA I01 RX001663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve the quality of artificial vision that arises from retinal prostheses, it is important to bring electrically-elicited neural activity more in line with the physiological signaling patterns that arise normally in the healthy retina. Our previous study reported that indirect activation produces a closer match to physiological responses in ON retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) than in OFF cells (Im and Fried 2015 J. Physiol. 593 3677-96). This suggests that a preferential activation of ON RGCs would shape the overall retinal response closer to natural signaling. Recently, we found that changes to the rate at which stimulation was delivered could bias responses towards a stronger ON component (Im and Fried 2016a J. Neural Eng. 13 025002), raising the possibility that changes to other stimulus parameters can similarly bias towards stronger ON responses. Here, we explore the effects of changing stimulus duration on the responses in ON and OFF types of brisk transient (BT) and brisk sustained (BS) RGCs. APPROACH: We used cell-attached patch clamp to record RGC spiking in the isolated rabbit retina. Targeted RGCs were first classified as ON or OFF type by their light responses, and further sub-classified as BT or BS types by their responses to both light and electric stimuli. Spiking in targeted RGCs was recorded in response to electric pulses with durations varying from 5 to100 ms. Stimulus amplitude was adjusted at each duration to hold total charge constant for all experiments. MAIN

resultsWe found that varying stimulus durations modulated responses differentially for ON versus OFF cells: in ON cells, spike counts decreased significantly with increasing stimulus duration while in OFF cells the changes were more modest. The maximum ratio of ON versus OFF responses occurred at a duration of ~10 ms. The difference in response strength for BT versus BS cells was much larger in ON cells than in OFF cells. SIGNIFICANCE: The stimulation rates preferred by subjects during clinical trials are similar to the rates that maximize the ON/OFF response ratio in in vitro testing (Im and Fried 2016a J. Neural Eng. 13 025002). Here, we determine the stimulus duration that produces the strongest bias towards ON responses and speculate that it will further enhance clinical effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationNerve NetPhotic StimulationRabbitsRetinal Ganglion CellsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29415876
PMCPMC5927815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.