Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415789›Full record

SynthesisTwin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies2018

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Twins Compared With Singleton Children: A Systematic Review.

Oluwole A Babatunde, Sally N Adebamowo, IkeOluwa O Ajayi, Clement A Adebamowo

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewTwin Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oluwole A BabatundeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,University of South Carolina,Columbia,South Carolina,USA.
Sally N AdebamowoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health,University of Maryland School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland,USA.
IkeOluwa O AjayiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics,Faculty of Public Health,College of Medicine,University of Ibadan,Ibadan,Nigeria.
Clement A AdebamowoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health,University of Maryland School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland,USA.

Funding

Entrenching Training and Capacity in Research Ethics in Nigeria (ENTRENCH) ProgramR25TW010514 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO, OGUNDIRAN, TEMIDAYO OLUSADE · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
Training Program in Nigeria for NCD Research (TRAPING - NCD)D43TW009106 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
Identifying predictors of racial disparity in treatment and mortality among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in South Carolina and geospatial investigation of breast cancer patient navigationF99CA222722 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BABATUNDE, OLUWOLE ADEYEMI · 2017 to 2018
$80k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009106FIC NIH HHS R25 TW010514NCI NIH HHS F99 CA222722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 200 million children aged <5 years fail to reach their full cognitive potential, and children born as twins are particularly at risk. In this article, we review studies that examined differences in the neurodevelopmental outcomes of twins compared to singletons. We searched the Medline database for articles on twins, singletons, neuro, and cognitive development. We also inspected bibliographies of relevant publications to identify related articles from 2011 to 2017. Our search criteria yielded 162 studies, 8 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of the eight studies examined, four were prospective follow-up studies, three were cross-sectional studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. Five of these studies were carried out in developed countries, and they found no statistically significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes among twins and singletons. However, two of the three studies carried out in developing countries found a difference with singletons having significantly higher academic ratings than twins. Studies in which neurodevelopmental outcomes were measured early in life (1-5 years) showed no significant twin-singleton differences, while those in which it was measured later in life showed mixed twin-singleton differences. Overall, these studies may have been underpowered and may not have been optimally designed and implemented. There is need for studies with adequate sample sizes, good design, and optimal measurement of all relevant covariates in order to resolve the conflicting reports in the literature.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTwinscognitive developmentneurodevelopmentsingletontwins

Identifiers

PMID29415789
PMCPMC7296909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.