Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415773›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

End-expiratory occlusion maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in the intensive care unit: an echocardiographic study.

Delphine Georges, Hugues de Courson, Romain Lanchon, Musa Sesay, Karine Nouette-Gaulain, Matthieu Biais

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04283851 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Parameters in Evaluation of Fluid Resposiveness in Cardiac Surgery Patients in the Early Postoperative Period

TypeobservationalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2020 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsHypovolemia, Hypotension, SurgeryArmstesting functional haemodynamic parameters for preload assessment
NCT04934943 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

"Mini Fluid Challenge Assessment: a Comparison Among Three Hemodynamic Tools"

TypeobservationalSponsorHumanitas Clinical and Research CenterRan2025 to 2025Enrolled45ConditionsSepsis, Shock, Septic, Critically IllArmsmini_FC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delphine GeorgesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Hugues de CoursonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Romain LanchonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Musa SesayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Karine Nouette-GaulainDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Matthieu BiaisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. matthieu.biais@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-9058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn mechanically ventilated patients, an increase in cardiac index during an end-expiratory-occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness. To identify this rapid increase in cardiac index, continuous and instantaneous cardiac index monitoring is necessary, decreasing its feasibility at the bedside. Our study was designed to investigate whether changes in velocity time integral and in peak velocity obtained using transthoracic echocardiography during an end-expiratory-occlusion maneuver could predict fluid responsiveness.

methodsThis single-center, prospective study included 50 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Velocity time integral and peak velocity were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography before and at the end of a 12-sec end-expiratory-occlusion maneuver. A third set of measurements was performed after volume expansion (500 mL of saline 0.9% given over 15 minutes). Patients were considered as responders if cardiac output increased by 15% or more after volume expansion.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were responders. At baseline, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, velocity time integral and peak velocity were similar between responders and non-responders. End-expiratory-occlusion maneuver induced a significant increase in velocity time integral both in responders and non-responders, and a significant increase in peak velocity only in responders. A 9% increase in velocity time integral induced by the end-expiratory-occlusion maneuver predicted fluid responsiveness with sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 72% to 98%) and specificity of 95% (95% CI 77% to 100%). An 8.5% increase in peak velocity induced by the end-expiratory-occlusion maneuver predicted fluid responsiveness with sensitivity of 64% (95% CI 44% to 81%) and specificity of 77% (95% CI 55% to 92%). The area under the receiver operating curve generated for changes in velocity time integral was significantly higher than the one generated for changes in peak velocity (0.96 ± 0.03 versus 0.70 ± 0.07, respectively, P = 0.0004 for both). The gray zone ranged between 6 and 10% (20% of the patients) for changes in velocity time integral and between 1 and 13% (62% of the patients) for changes in peak velocity.

conclusionsIn mechanically ventilated and sedated patients in the neuro Intensive Care Unit, changes in velocity time integral during a 12-sec end-expiratory-occlusion maneuver were able to predict fluid responsiveness and perform better than changes in peak velocity.

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsAdultAgedBlood VolumeCardiac OutputEchocardiographyExhalationFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationProspective StudiesEchocardiographyEnd-expiratory occlusionFluid responsivenessHeart-lung interactionsVolume expansion

Identifiers

PMID29415773
PMCPMC5804059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.