ArticleGenome biology2018
Correction to: A statistical framework for analyzing deep mutational scanning data.
Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Site-saturation functional screens identify PALB2 missense variants associated with increased breast cancer risk.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Large-scale experimental assessment of variant effects on the structure and function of the citrate transporter SLC13A5.Science advances · 2025Article
- Genes Vary Greatly in Their Propensity for Collateral Fitness Effects of Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
correctionAfter publication of our article [1] it was brought to our attention that a line of code was missing from our program to combine the within-replicate variance and between-replicate variance. This led to an overestimation of the standard errors calculated using the Enrich2 random-effects model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.