Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415740›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2018

Guidelines for responsible short-term global health activities: developing common principles.

Judith N Lasker, Myron Aldrink, Ramaswami Balasubramaniam, Paul Caldron, Bruce Compton, Jessica Evert, Lawrence C Loh, Shailendra Prasad, Shira Siegel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Judith N LaskerDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA. jnl0@lehigh.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-1810
Myron AldrinkMedical and Surgical Skills Institute, 2440 Westbrook Dr. NW, Grand Rapids, MI, 45904, USA.
Ramaswami BalasubramaniamSwami Vivekananda Youth Movement, CA-2, KIADB Industrial Housing Area Ring Road, Hebbal, Mysuru, Karnataka State, 570016, India.
Paul CaldronUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, 4550 E. Bell Rd, Suite, Phoenix, AZ, 172, USA.
Bruce ComptonCatholic Health Association of the United States, 4455 Woodson Road, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jessica EvertUniversity of California, 1001 Potrero Ave., 83, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Lawrence C LohDalla Lana School of Public Health, c/o Public Health and Preventive Medicine Residency Program, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 5th Floor, MST 3M&, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shailendra PrasadCenter for Global Health and Social Responsibility, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 329, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Shira Siegel, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

Lehigh University NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing concerns about the value and effectiveness of short-term volunteer trips intending to improve health in underserved Global South communities has driven the development of guidelines by multiple organizations and individuals. These are intended to mitigate potential harms and maximize benefits associated with such efforts.

methodThis paper analyzes 27 guidelines derived from a scoping review of the literature available in early 2017, describing their authorship, intended audiences, the aspects of short term medical missions (STMMs) they address, and their attention to guideline implementation. It further considers how these guidelines relate to the desires of host communities, as seen in studies of host country staff who work with volunteers.

resultsExisting guidelines are almost entirely written by and addressed to educators and practitioners in the Global North. There is broad consensus on key principles for responsible, effective, and ethical programs--need for host partners, proper preparation and supervision of visitors, needs assessment and evaluation, sustainability, and adherence to pertinent legal and ethical standards. Host country staff studies suggest agreement with the main elements of this guideline consensus, but they add the importance of mutual learning and respect for hosts.

conclusionsGuidelines must be informed by research and policy directives from host countries that is now mostly absent. Also, a comprehensive strategy to support adherence to best practice guidelines is needed, given limited regulation and enforcement capacity in host country contexts and strong incentives for involved stakeholders to undertake or host STMMs that do not respect key principles.

Indexed as

Global HealthGuidelines as TopicEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMedical MissionsReview Literature as TopicVolunteersBest practicesGlobal health educationGuidelinesShort-term medical missionsStandardsVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID29415740
PMCPMC5803894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.