Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415687›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2018

A physical activity intervention for children with type 1 diabetes- steps to active kids with diabetes (STAK-D): a feasibility study.

Helen Quirk, Cris Glazebrook, Holly Blake

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02144337 (The Feasibility of a Physical Activity Intervention for Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02144337 nacompletednot on this map

The Feasibility of a Physical Activity Intervention for Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Steps To Active Kids (STAK)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2014 to 2015Enrolled13ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Physical ActivityArmsSteps To Active Kids (STAK) programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen QuirkCentre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. h.quirk@shu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-4681
Cris GlazebrookDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, A Floor, South Block Link, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBSheffield Hallam University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study describes the development and feasibility evaluation of a physical activity intervention for children with type 1 diabetes called 'Steps to Active Kids with Diabetes' (STAK-D). It aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study design.

methodsThirteen children aged 9-11 years and their parents were recruited from one paediatric diabetes clinic. A process evaluation was conducted alongside a two-arm randomised feasibility trial, including assessment of rate of recruitment, adherence, retention, data completion and burden, implementation fidelity and adverse events. Qualitative interviews with children (n = 9), parents (n = 8), healthcare professionals (n = 3) and STAK-D volunteers (n = 8) explored intervention acceptability. Interviews were analysed thematically.

resultsRate of recruitment was 25%, with 77% retention at 3-month follow-up. Study burden was low, data completion was high and the intervention was delivered as per protocol. No serious adverse event was reported. Engagement with intervention materials was generally good, but attendance at group activity sessions was low due to logistical barriers. Interview analysis identified preferred methods of recruitment, motivations for recruitment, barriers and facilitators to adherence, the experience of data collection, experience of the STAK-D programme and its perceived benefits.

conclusionsSTAK-D was feasible and acceptable to children, their parents and healthcare professionals, but group sessions may present logistical issues. Recruitment and retention may be improved with a clinic-wide approach to recruitment.

trial registrationThis trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02144337 (16/01/2014).

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Exercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient CompliancePatient SelectionQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyTreatment OutcomeChildrenFeasibility studyInterventionPaediatric diabetesPhysical activityProcess evaluationSelf-efficacyType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29415687
PMCPMC5804086
OpenAlexW2787038532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.