ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2018
Common Items on a Bucket List.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual, Nurse-Led Early Primary Palliative Care Intervention (ELICIT) for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Fulfilling end-of-life dreams: A scoping review of bucket lists in palliative and hospice care.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Functional goals and outcomes of rehabilitation within palliative care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Sustaining Joy in Serious Neurologic Illnesses.Seminars in neurology · 2024Review
- Can virtual reality travel help nursing home patients fulfill their bucket list?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Challenges in self-management of persons living with advanced cancer: An exploratory, in-depth interview study.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2022Observational
- Perceptions of time spent pursuing cancer care among patients, caregivers, and oncology professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Would people living with epilepsy benefit from palliative care?Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Review
- Community Views on 'What I Want 'Before I Die'.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo provide preference-sensitive care, we propose that clinicians might routinely inquire about their patients' bucket-lists and discuss the impact (if any) of their medical treatments on their life goals.
methodsThis cross-sectional, mixed methods online study explores the concept of the bucket list and seeks to identify common bucket list themes. Data were collected in 2015-2016 through an online survey, which was completed by a total of 3056 participants across the United States. Forty participants who had a bucket list were identified randomly and used as the development cohort: their responses were analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory methods to identify the six key bucket list themes. The responses of the remaining 3016 participants were used for the validation study. The codes identified from the development cohort were validated by analyses of responses from 50 randomly drawn subjects from the validation cohort. All the 3016 validation cohort transcripts were coded for presence or absence of each of the six bucket list themes.
resultsAround 91.2% participants had a bucket list. Age and spirituality influence the patient's bucket-list. Participants who reported that faith/religion/spirituality was important to them were most likely (95%) to have a bucket list compared with those who reported it to be unimportant (68.2%), χ
conclusionsThe bucket list is a simple framework that can be used to engage patients about their healthcare decision making. Knowing a patient's bucket list can aid clinicians in relating each treatment option to its potential impact (if any) on the patient's life and life goals to promote informed decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.