Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415602›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2018

Common Items on a Bucket List.

Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil, Eric Neri, Helena Kraemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Perceptions of time spent pursuing cancer care among patients, caregivers, and oncology professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Community Views on 'What I Want 'Before I Die'.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil1 Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Center of Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Eric Neri1 Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Center of Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Helena Kraemer1 Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Center of Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.

Funding

Trial of strategies to communicate genetic information to different ethnic and racial subpopulationsU54MD010724 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD · 2016 to 2021
$16.3M
In-reach for Successful Aging through Education(i-SAGE)R25MD006857 · NIMHD · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS R25 MD006857NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide preference-sensitive care, we propose that clinicians might routinely inquire about their patients' bucket-lists and discuss the impact (if any) of their medical treatments on their life goals.

methodsThis cross-sectional, mixed methods online study explores the concept of the bucket list and seeks to identify common bucket list themes. Data were collected in 2015-2016 through an online survey, which was completed by a total of 3056 participants across the United States. Forty participants who had a bucket list were identified randomly and used as the development cohort: their responses were analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory methods to identify the six key bucket list themes. The responses of the remaining 3016 participants were used for the validation study. The codes identified from the development cohort were validated by analyses of responses from 50 randomly drawn subjects from the validation cohort. All the 3016 validation cohort transcripts were coded for presence or absence of each of the six bucket list themes.

resultsAround 91.2% participants had a bucket list. Age and spirituality influence the patient's bucket-list. Participants who reported that faith/religion/spirituality was important to them were most likely (95%) to have a bucket list compared with those who reported it to be unimportant (68.2%), χ

conclusionsThe bucket list is a simple framework that can be used to engage patients about their healthcare decision making. Knowing a patient's bucket list can aid clinicians in relating each treatment option to its potential impact (if any) on the patient's life and life goals to promote informed decision making.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningGoalsPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesadvance care planningbucket listcross culturalgoals of caremulti ethnicpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID29415602
PMCPMC5946728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.