Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415562›Full record

ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

Retrospective Review of a Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (Beriplex P/N) for the Management of Perioperative Bleeding Unrelated to Oral Anticoagulation.

Pratima Chowdary, Augustine Tang, Dale Watson, Martin Besser, Peter Collins, Michael Desmond Creagh, Hafiz Qureshi, Margaret Rokicka, Tim Nokes, Paul Diprose and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current Practice in FFP Preparation and Use in Greece: A National SurveyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pratima Chowdary1 Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Augustine Tang2 Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospital FT, Blackpool, United Kingdom.
Dale Watson2 Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospital FT, Blackpool, United Kingdom.
Martin Besser4 Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter Collins5 Arthur Bloom Haemophilia Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Michael Desmond Creagh6 Department of Haematology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom.
Hafiz Qureshi7 Department of Transfusion Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Margaret Rokicka8 Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom.
Tim Nokes9 Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Paul Diprose10 Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ravi Gill10 Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multicenter, retrospective, observational study of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and/or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) use within routine clinical care unrelated to vitamin K antagonists was conducted. The PCC was administered preprocedure for correction of coagulopathy (prophylactic cohort) and treatment of bleeding postsurgery (treatment cohort). Of the 445 patients included, 40 were in the prophylactic cohort (PCC alone [n = 16], PCC and FFP [n = 5], FFP alone [n = 19]) and 405 were in the treatment cohort (PCC alone [n = 228], PCC and FFP [n = 123], FFP alone [n = 54]). Cardiovascular surgery was the most common setting. PCC doses ranged between 500 and 5000 IU. Effectiveness (assessed retrospectively) was reported as effective in 93.0% in the PCC-only group (95% confidence interval, 89.1% to 95.9%), 78.9% (70.8% to 85.6%) with PCC and FFP, and 86.3% (76.2% to 93.2%) with FFP alone. In the treatment cohort, international normalized ratio was significantly reduced in all 3 groups. In patients who received PCC, the rate of thromboembolic events (1.9%) was below rates in the literature for similar procedures. PCCs offer a potential alternative to FFP in the management of perioperative bleeding unrelated to oral anticoagulant therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation DisordersBlood Coagulation FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CareRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation Factorsprothrombin complex concentratesbleedingcardiovascular surgeryfresh frozen plasmaprophylaxisprothrombin complex concentrate

Identifiers

PMID29415562
PMCPMC6714747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.