Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29415017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

gDNA extraction yield and methylation status of blood samples are affected by long-term storage conditions.

Charlotte Schröder, Werner Steimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Tiger Rattlesnake genome reveals a complex genotype underlying a simple venom phenotype.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte SchröderInstitut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Werner SteimerInstitut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8970-1089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics is believed to provide great chances for a better understanding of the development and treatment of many diseases where the analysis of genomic DNA has so far failed to provide conclusive answers. Methylcytosine is a frequently used quantitative marker of epigenetic studies. Since immediate analysis of sampled material is in most cases not possible, storage time and conditions are critical aspects regarding the quality of genomic DNA and reliability of analysis. Blood is frequently used for such analyses. We, therefore, collected blood samples of ten volunteers and stored them under various conditions for ten months: -70°C, -20°C, 2-8°C and room temperature. An additional aliquot was frozen at -70°C and thawed once a week at room temperature. We then compared the DNA extraction yields and methylation status in relation to storage time and conditions. We found significantly lower DNA extraction yields (up to -97.45%; p ≤ 0.001) as well as significantly higher methylation levels after ten months of storage (up to +42.0%; p ≤ 0.001). These results suggest that storage time has an important influence on DNA analyses of blood samples for all storage conditions. This might be due to differences in stability of methylated and non-methylated DNA. Our study indicates that storage conditions and time may be a critical factor for epigenetic methylation studies and require rigorous validation. For reliable analyses we, therefore, recommend to perform epigenetic analysis directly after sample collection.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDNAHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA

Identifiers

PMID29415017
PMCPMC5802893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.