Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29414986›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 fecal shedding in feedlot pens is affected by the water-to-cattle ratio: A randomized controlled trial.

Wendy Beauvais, Elena V Gart, Melissa Bean, Anthony Blanco, Jennifer Wilsey, Kallie McWhinney, Laura Bryan, Mary Krath, Ching-Yuan Yang, Diego Manriquez Alvarez and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections Associated With Romaine Lettuce-United States, 2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy BeauvaisCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-3331
Elena V GartCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Melissa BeanCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Anthony BlancoCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jennifer WilseyCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Kallie McWhinneyCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Laura BryanCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Mary KrathCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Ching-Yuan YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Diego Manriquez AlvarezCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Sushil PaudyalWest Texas A&M University, Canyon, Texas, United States of America.
Kelsey BryanTexas A&M Agrilife Research, Amarillo, Texas, United States of America.
Samantha StewartAnimal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Peter W CookAnimal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Glenn LahodnyCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Karina BaumgartenCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Raju GautamCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Kendra NightingaleAnimal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Sara D LawhonCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Pablo PinedoTexas A&M Agrilife Research, Amarillo, Texas, United States of America.
Renata IvanekCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · USTexas Tech University · USCornell University · USWest Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Veterinary Student Research TrainingT35OD010991 · OD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GADDY, DANA · 2012 to 2025
$920k
NIH HHS 5 T32 0D 011083-8NIH HHS 5T35OD010991NIH HHS T35 OD010991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 fecal shedding in feedlot cattle is common and is a public health concern due to the risk of foodborne transmission that can result in severe, or even fatal, disease in people. Despite a large body of research, few practical and cost-effective farm-level interventions have been identified. In this study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effect of reducing the level of water in automatically refilling water-troughs on fecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot cattle. Pens in a feedlot in the Texas Panhandle were randomly allocated as control (total number: 17) or intervention (total number: 18) pens. Fecal samples (2,759 in total) were collected both at baseline and three weeks after the intervention, and tested for the presence of E. coli O157:H7 using immunomagnetic bead separation and selective culture. There was a strong statistical association between sampling date and the likelihood of a fecal sample testing positive for E. coli O157:H7. Pen was also a strong predictor of fecal prevalence. Despite accounting for this high level of clustering, a statistically significant association between reduced water levels in the trough and increased prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in the feces was observed (Odds Ratio = 1.6; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.2-2.0; Likelihood Ratio Test: p = 0.02). This is the first time that such an association has been reported, and suggests that increasing water-trough levels may be effective in reducing shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in cattle feces, although further work would be needed to test this hypothesis. Controlling E. coli O157:H7 fecal shedding at the pre-harvest level may lead to a reduced burden of human foodborne illness attributed to this pathogen in beef.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleColony Count, MicrobialDrinking WaterEscherichia coli O157FecesMultivariate AnalysisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk FactorsWeatherDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID29414986
PMCPMC5802916
OpenAlexW2790997154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.