Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29414944›Full record

Trial reportNature2018

Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behaviour.

Athena Akrami, Charles D Kopec, Mathew E Diamond, Carlos D Brody

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lipid Activation of a Thalamic GPCR Extends Working Memory Time-scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoupling Choice from Motor Response Reduces Choice-History Effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Addressing degeneracy in rodent studies of cognition.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Athena AkramiPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Charles D KopecPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Mathew E DiamondTactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34136 Trieste, Italy.
Carlos D BrodyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many models of cognition and of neural computations posit the use and estimation of prior stimulus statistics: it has long been known that working memory and perception are strongly impacted by previous sensory experience, even when that sensory history is not relevant to the current task at hand. Nevertheless, the neural mechanisms and regions of the brain that are necessary for computing and using such prior experience are unknown. Here we report that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a critical locus for the representation and use of prior stimulus information. We trained rats in an auditory parametric working memory task, and found that they displayed substantial and readily quantifiable behavioural effects of sensory-stimulus history, similar to those observed in humans and monkeys. Earlier proposals that the PPC supports working memory predict that optogenetic silencing of this region would impair behaviour in our working memory task. Contrary to this prediction, we found that silencing the PPC significantly improved performance. Quantitative analyses of behaviour revealed that this improvement was due to the selective reduction of the effects of prior sensory stimuli. Electrophysiological recordings showed that PPC neurons carried far more information about the sensory stimuli of previous trials than about the stimuli of the current trial. Furthermore, for a given rat, the more information about previous trial sensory history in the neural firing rates of the PPC, the greater the behavioural effect of sensory history, suggesting a tight link between behaviour and PPC representations of stimulus history. Our results indicate that the PPC is a central component in the processing of sensory-stimulus history, and could enable further neurobiological investigation of long-standing questions regarding how perception and working memory are affected by prior sensory information.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBehaviorBehavior, AnimalFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuronsOptogeneticsParietal LobePsychometricsRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID29414944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.