Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29414831›Full record

Observational studyMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2018

"Real-life" Efficacy and Safety Aspects of 4-Year Omalizumab Treatment for Asthma.

Mona Al-Ahmad, Nermina Arifhodzic, Jasmina Nurkic, Ahmed Maher, Tito Rodriguez-Bouza, Nasser Al-Ahmed, Ali Sadek, Edin Jusufovic

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Allergen-Specific Treg Cells Upregulated by Lung-StageFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Adherence to omalizumab: A multicenter "real-world" study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mona Al-AhmadDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Nermina ArifhodzicAl-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Jasmina NurkicAl-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Ahmed MaherAl-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Tito Rodriguez-BouzaAl-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Nasser Al-AhmedAl-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Ali SadekNational Center of Health Information, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Edin JusufovicCathedra for Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Ministry of Health · KWKuwait University · KWUniversity of Tuzla · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in asthma in a real-life setting. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis 4-year observational study included 65 patients treated with omalizumab during clinic visits; treatment response was rated as excellent, good, and partial based on a modified physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (mGETE) scale of emergency room visits (ERV), hospitalization, use of oral corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) dose, and short-acting β-agonist rescue. The following tests were done: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the asthma control test (ACT). Measurements were performed 1 month before therapy and at 16 weeks, 1 year, and 4 years of treatment. Statistical analyses were done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman rank correlation, and McNemar χ2 test.

resultsThe dropout rate was 15 (18.5%): 8 nonresponders (10.0%); 2 patients died (2.5%), and 5 were lost to follow-up (6.25%). Treatment response was excellent in 35 (53.8%); good in 23 (35.4%), and partial in 7 patients (10.8%). The number of excellent responders increased from 35 (53.8%) at 16 weeks to 48 (73.8%) at the 4-year follow-up. The number of patients who did not require ERV improved from 0 to 59 (90.8%), and the lowest rate of hospitalization was 1 in year 4 (p < 0.001); patients who did not require courses of oral corticosteroids improved from 0 to 54 (83%). ICS/LABA dose significantly reduced from 65 (100%) to 25 (38.5%) after 4 years of treatment (p < 0.001); ACT scores significantly increased from 15 ± 3 at baseline to 23 ± 3 (p < 0.001) and FEV1 level from 55.6 ± 10.6 to 76.63 ± 10.34 at year 4.

conclusionIn this study, omalizumab therapy resulted in better asthma control, and was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmalizumabTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGlucocorticoidsOmalizumabAsthmaEfficacyLong-term therapyOmalizumabSafety

Identifiers

PMID29414831
PMCPMC6062694
OpenAlexW2792973955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.