Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29414794›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Bacterial copper storage proteins.

Christopher Dennison, Sholto David, Jaeick Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Family Identification and Functional Study of Copper Transporter Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unique underlying principles shaping copper homeostasis networks.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Copper delivery to an endospore coat protein ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher DennisonInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: christopher.dennison@ncl.ac.uk.
Sholto DavidInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Jaeick LeeInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008439/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper is essential for most organisms as a cofactor for key enzymes involved in fundamental processes such as respiration and photosynthesis. However, copper also has toxic effects in cells, which is why eukaryotes and prokaryotes have evolved mechanisms for safe copper handling. A new family of bacterial proteins uses a Cys-rich four-helix bundle to safely store large quantities of Cu(I). The work leading to the discovery of these proteins, their properties and physiological functions, and how their presence potentially impacts the current views of bacterial copper handling and use are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsCopperMetalloproteinsBacterial ProteinsCopperMetalloproteinsbacterial copper homeostasiscoppercopper storagecopper transportmetal homeostasismetalloproteinmethane oxidationmethanotrophsstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID29414794
PMCPMC5880151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.