ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Modeling the Dynamics of Cdc42 Oscillation in Fission Yeast.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rax1/2 promote memory of growth by early Ras1 activation to maintain polarity across generations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Oscillatory dynamics of Rac1 activity in Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Arp2/3-dependent endocytosis ensures Cdc42 oscillations by removing Pak1-mediated negative feedback.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Article
- Quantitative models for building and growing fated small cell networks.Interface focus · 2022Review
- Oscillatory Switches of Dorso-Ventral Polarity in Cells Confined between Two Surfaces.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulation of polarized cell growth is essential for many cellular processes, including spatial coordination of cell morphology changes during growth and division. We present a mathematical model of the core mechanism responsible for the regulation of polarized growth dynamics by the small GTPase Cdc42. The model is based on the competition of growth zones of Cdc42 localized at the cell tips for a common substrate (inactive Cdc42) that diffuses in the cytosol. We consider several potential ways of implementing negative feedback between Cd42 and its GEF in this model that would be consistent with the observed oscillations of Cdc42 in fission yeast. We analyze the bifurcations in this model as the cell length increases, and total amount of Cdc42 and GEF increase. Symmetric antiphase oscillations at two tips emerge via saddle-homoclinic bifurcations or Hopf bifurcations. We find that a stable oscillation and a stable steady state can coexist, which is consistent with the experimental finding that only 50% of bipolar cells oscillate. The mean amplitude and period can be tuned by parameters involved in the negative feedback. We link modifications in the parameters of the model to observed mutant phenotypes. Our model suggests that negative feedback is more likely to be acting through inhibition of GEF association rather than upregulation of GEF dissociation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.