Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29414070›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2018

The promise and perils of causal circuit manipulations.

Steffen Be Wolff, Bence P Ölveczky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Mapping global brain reconfigurations following local targeted manipulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. The Role of Striatum in Controlling Waiting during Reactive and Self-Timed Behaviors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recurrent Neural Circuits Overcome Partial Inactivation by Compensation and Re-learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steffen Be WolffDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Bence P ÖlveczkyDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: olveczky@fas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Neural Circuits Underlying the Acquisition and Control of Motor SkillsR01NS099323 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Bence P Olveczky · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
CRCNS: Refining computational models of motor sequence learning and executionR01NS105349 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ESCOLA, GARY SEAN, OLVECZKY, BENCE P · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099323NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of increasingly sophisticated methods for recording and manipulating neural activity is revolutionizing neuroscience. By probing how activity patterns in different types of neurons and circuits contribute to behavior, these tools can help inform mechanistic models of brain function and explain the roles of distinct circuit elements. However, in systems where functions are distributed over large networks, interpreting causality experiments can be challenging. Here we review common assumptions underlying circuit manipulations in behaving animals and discuss the strengths and limitations of different approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29414070
PMCPMC5957484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.