Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29413756›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2018

The Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) in a High-Risk Population: What Causes BPE?

Chao You, Anna K Kaiser, Pascal Baltzer, Julia Krammer, Yajia Gu, Weijun Peng, Stefan O Schönberg, Clemens G Kaiser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao YouDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University.
Anna K KaiserSchool of Social Science, University of Mannheim.
Pascal BaltzerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Hospital Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Julia KrammerInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg.
Yajia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University.
Weijun PengDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University.
Stefan O SchönbergInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg.
Clemens G KaiserInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg. Electronic address: clemens.kaiser@umm.de.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate promoting factors for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in MR mammography (MRM).

methods146 patients were retrospectively evaluated, including 91 high-risk patients (50 BRCA patients, 41 patients with elevated lifetime risk). 56 screening patients were matched to the high-risk cases on the basis of age. The correlation of BPE with factors such as fibroglandular tissue (FGT), age, menopausal status, breast cancer, high-risk precondition as well as motion were investigated using linear regression.

resultsBPE positively correlated with FGT (P<.001) and negatively correlated with menopausal status (P<.001). Cancer did not show an effect on BPE (P>.05). A high-risk precondition showed a significant impact on the formation of BPE (P<.05). However, when corrected for motion, the correlation between BPE and a high-risk precondition became weak and insignificant, and a highly significant association between BPE and motion was revealed (P<.01).

conclusionBPE positively correlated with FGT and negatively correlated with age. Cancer did not have an effect on BPE. A high-risk precondition appears to have a negative effect on BPE. However, when corrected for motion, high-risk preconditions became insignificant. Technical as well as physiological influences seem to play an important role in the formation of BPE.

Identifiers

PMID29413756
PMCPMC5884181
OpenAlexW2785561465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.