Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29413749›Full record

ReviewDifferentiation; research in biological diversity

How stem cells keep telomeres in check.

Julia Su Zhou Li, Eros Lazzerini Denchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Differentiation; research in biological diversity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia Su Zhou LiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Eros Lazzerini DenchiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: edenchi@scripps.edu.

Funding

Role of TZAP in telomere homoeostasisR01GM122987 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BODDY, MICHAEL N · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, regulation of telomere length in pluripotent stem cells is critical to ensure organism development and survival. Telomeres consist of repetitive DNA that are progressively lost with each cellular division. When telomeres become critically short, they activate a DNA damage response that results in cell cycle arrest. To counteract telomere attrition, pluripotent stem cells are equipped with telomere elongation mechanisms that ensure prolonged proliferation capacity and self-renewal capacity. Excessive telomere elongation can also be deleterious and is counteracted by a rapid telomere deletion mechanism termed telomere trimming. While the consequences of critically short telomeres are well established, we are only beginning to understand the mechanisms that counteract excessive telomere elongation. The balance between telomere elongation and shortening determine the telomere length set point in pluripotent stem cells and ensures sustained proliferative potential without causing chromosome instability.

Indexed as

Telomere HomeostasisAnimalsHumansPluripotent Stem CellsTelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsTelomere-Binding ProteinsShelterinStem cellsTelomereTelomere trimmingTZAPZBTB48

Identifiers

PMID29413749
PMCPMC5889314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.