Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29413432›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Effects of nicotine-containing and "nicotine-free" e-cigarette refill liquids on intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Andrew C Harris, Peter Muelken, John R Smethells, Katrina Yershova, Irina Stepanov, Thao Tran Olson, Kenneth J Kellar, Mark G LeSage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew C HarrisDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: harr0547@umn.edu.
Peter MuelkenDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
John R SmethellsDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Katrina YershovaMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Irina StepanovMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Thao Tran OlsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth J KellarDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Mark G LeSageDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Animal models for evaluating the relative abuse liability of electronic cigarettesR03DA042009 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS, ANDREW CHARLES · 2016 to 2017
$221k
NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA042009NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal models are needed to inform FDA regulation of electronic cigarettes (ECs) because they avoid limitations associated with human studies. We previously reported that an EC refill liquid produced less aversive/anhedonic effects at a high nicotine dose than nicotine alone as measured by elevations in intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, which may reflect the presence of behaviorally active non-nicotine constituents (e.g., propylene glycol) in the EC liquids. The primary objective of this study was to assess the generality of our prior ICSS findings to two additional EC liquids. We also compared effects of "nicotine-free" varieties of these EC liquids on ICSS, as well as binding affinity and/or functional activity of nicotine alone, nicotine-containing EC liquids, and "nicotine-free" EC liquids at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). METHODS AND

resultsNicotine alone and nicotine dose-equivalent concentrations of both nicotine-containing EC liquids produced similar lowering of ICSS thresholds at low to moderate nicotine doses, indicating similar reinforcement-enhancing effects. At high nicotine doses, nicotine alone elevated ICSS thresholds (a measure of anhedonia-like behavior) while the EC liquids did not. Nicotine-containing EC liquids did not differ from nicotine alone in terms of binding affinity or functional activity at nAChRs. "Nicotine-free" EC liquids did not affect ICSS, but bound with low affinity at some (e.g., α4ß2) nAChRs.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that non-nicotine constituents in these EC liquids do not contribute to their reinforcement-enhancing effects. However, they may attenuate nicotine's acute aversive/anhedonic and/or toxic effects, which may moderate the abuse liability and/or toxicity of ECs.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleModels, AnimalNicotineRatsReinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationSelf StimulationNicotineElectronic cigarettesIntracranial self-stimulationNicotineNon-nicotine tobacco constituentsTobacco control policy

Identifiers

PMID29413432
PMCPMC5889751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.