ReviewTrends in cancer2018
Transforming Biomarker Development with Exceptional Responders.
Review in Trends in cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Candidate biomarker assessment for pharmacological response.Translational oncology · 2020Article
- When should we order a next generation sequencing test in a patient with cancer?EClinicalMedicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Curative therapy for cancer patients with advanced-stage disease remains elusive. While rare outlier responses to anticancer therapies exist, barriers limit our understanding of the molecular and genetic basis of such profound, life-altering responses. Here, we describe how phenotype-to-genotype studies are elucidating the molecular underpinnings of outlier responses and informing strategies to extend such unprecedented sensitivity to broader molecularly defined patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.