ArticleThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2018
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: idiopathic no more?
Article in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in pulmonary fibrosis: from lung surfactant to the immune connection.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Emerging Therapies in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Fatty acid nitroalkene reversal of established lung fibrosis.Redox biology · 2022Article
- Demystifying idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: time for more etiology-focused nomenclature in interstitial lung disease.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2022Review
- NADPH Oxidase Inhibition in Fibrotic Pathologies.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2020Article
- Developmental pathways in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29413084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.