Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29412882›Full record

ReviewClinics in laboratory medicine2018

Biospecimens and Biobanking in Global Health.

Maimuna Mendy, Rita T Lawlor, Anne Linda van Kappel, Peter H J Riegman, Fay Betsou, Oliver D Cohen, Marianne K Henderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Establishment of a Lassa Fever Specimen Biobank in Nigeria.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Future of Biobanking: What Is Next?Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2020
    Article
  12. Pathology and Biobanking.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A practical starting guide to tear fluid biobanking.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maimuna MendyLaboratory Services and Biobank Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, Lyon 69372, France.
Rita T LawlorARC-Net Applied Research on Cancer Centre, University of Verona, Piazzale LA Scuro 10, Verona 37134, Italy.
Anne Linda van KappelIMV Technologies, ZI n°1 Est, l'Aigle 61300, France.
Peter H J RiegmanDepartment of Pathology, Tissue Bank, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015, The Netherlands.
Fay BetsouIntegrated BioBank of Luxembourg, 6 rue Nicolas Ernest Barble, Luxembourg L-1210, Luxembourg.
Oliver D CohenAGEIS EA 7407 Laboratory, Medical School of Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, Domaine de la Merci, La Tronche 38700, France.
Marianne K HendersonCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 3W534, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: hendersm@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks provide a critical infrastructure to support research in human health. Biospecimens and their accompanying data are increasingly needed to support biomedical research and clinical care. The original text was initially published in the Handbook for Cancer Research in Africa. The value of this publication is great as it underlines the importance of biobanks in Africa as a key resource to increase quality scientific research and participate in global health research. Therefore, a revision to extend these principles to other low resource contexts, to include updated material and references and add the topic of biobank sustainability were relevant.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchGlobal HealthHumansMedical InformaticsPathologySpecimen HandlingBiobanksBiospecimensCatalogsDataInformation technologyPathologyTissueUtilization

Identifiers

PMID29412882
PMCPMC11232505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.